Every upload becomes an indexed article
Your channel reaches people on YouTube. The article reaches everyone else — the ones who will read but never press play, and the ones who find you through search.
Rank for the question your video answers
A video page has almost no indexable text. The article puts the question in the title and the answer near the top, so it can win the search the video was made for.
Reach the people who read but never watch
A large share of people will read something they would never sit through. Same work, a different audience, no extra filming.
Make old uploads earn all over again
Videos that stopped being recommended are the easiest wins here — on search the article starts fresh, and age is not a penalty.
The parts that do the work.
Screenshots from the recording
Stills pulled from your own footage at points spread through the video, plus the thumbnail — the honest illustration, because it is literally what was on screen.
Your brand on every draft
A brand kit per workspace carries your colours, your licensed typefaces, two logo marks, the byline and the footer — and, since 19 August 2026, your written voice: paste something you have published and the drafts follow how you actually write. Measured, not trained.
Internal links that exist
Links are placed deterministically from pages actually crawled on your own site. The model is never asked to invent a URL.
The SEO fields, filled in
Title, meta description and headings written with the draft rather than bolted on after, and editable before anything publishes.
Publish where you already publish
Straight into WordPress, Ghost or Webflow, or out as clean HTML or Markdown.
Nothing invented
Numbers, names and quotations are preserved or the variant is discarded. Every claim traces back to the source.
YouTube creators, answered.
If the video answers something people search for, yes. The article ranks for that question and the video cannot. What does not work is publishing the raw transcript — it reads as speech and has been discounted as thin content for years.
No. It is a different surface reaching different people, and the article links back to the video — most creators see it as a feeder rather than a competitor.
Yes, when the video has them: they are accurate and they carry your actual words. For a video with none, paste the transcript instead.
No. There is no indexed text on a video page to duplicate, and the article is new prose rather than a copy. The real risk is publishing the same piece across several sites, which is a syndication problem.
Long enough to read the draft properly. The draft itself lands in one run; the part that takes real time is you checking it, which is the part that should.
Same workspace, different job.
Start with something you have already made.
A recording, a link or a transcript. It comes back as a draft you can read, edit and publish — on your brand kit, in your words.